Posterous
TJ is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Southpark_avatar_thumb
 

wtfwasithinking

What I wrote to the FCC today

I have "high speed" internet. What this means is a connection that's
acceptable for browsing the web and streaming low-quality video. I
realize many people in our country are still confined to dial-up. But
that's not the whole issue. I'm a web developer and I want more. I
need more. I want what other countries already have: fiber-to-the-curb
level access. This is not just a luxury. In order to fully participate
in the cloud-computing infrastructure and the inevitable conversion of
the web to a real-time data platform, my grossly assymetrical (read:
very low upstream bandwidth) connection just doesn't cut it. Believe
me, I've tried. I spent months trying to convert my workflow to take
advantage of the cloud and ultimately gave up in frustration. We're
not third-world when it comes to bandwidth, but we're second world at
best as consumers. I have the best consumer connection money can buy
and it's lacking. I'm considering moving to one of the few locations
in the US where connectivity rivals that of Japan et al.
 
This is not an issue of luxury. This is our economy. The writing is on
the wall. If we don't do something about this now, we'll fall farther
behind. We're 22nd now. The last I looked we were 16th. We're going
the wrong way.
 
If the FCC caves to the well-funded pressures of telco giants, we'll
keep going the wrong way. They're corporate profits and myopic
sensibilities don't serve our needs. As government officials please
remember who it is you're working for. I sincerely hope you can help
the citizens of our country on this vital issue.
 
Thanks for your attention.

Filed under  //   bandwidth   rants  
Posted July 15, 2009
// 1 Comment

Online Backups

A response I left on the NY Times Bits blog. It looks like the moderator dumped it, which suprised me. This is a from-the-trenches opinion/report. I’m getting so sick of abstract technical analysis.

Original story

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/online-backups-could-use-googles-expertise/

My response

The problem with online backup is not the lack of existing services. I’ve tried a few and they each more or less get the job done, with Dropbox and ZumoDrive being exceptional.

The problem is lack of bandwidth in the US. I have a “high speed” internet connection and pay for the “turbo boost” package. Despite the cute marketing terms and the hefty bill, what it boils down to is grossly asymmetrical bandwidth that’s piss-poor on the upstream side. At best, I can push 200MB an hour. At that rate it takes about 500 hours to upload 100GB, which is not even that much data in these days of massive photo files, HD movies, etc. I gave up in frustration and went back to external drives.

While other countries, most notably Japan, work to provide fiber connections to the majority of their citizens, we’re still partying like it’s 1999 here in the US. As a web developer and heavy internet user, I feel strongly that the bandwidth issue is more than just a PITA; it’s hurting our economy.

Don’t think for a second that Google doesn’t know how terrible the user experience is with online backup. They’ve been buying dark fiber on and off for years. But until that fiber gets to the curb, my guess is that they’d rather not deal with the support issues that would arise from a large-scale consumer-focused online storage system.

Filed under  //   backups   bandwidth   cloudcomputing   rants  
Posted July 11, 2009
// 0 Comments